Crop Biotech Update


A weekly summary of world developments in agri-biotech for developing countries, produced by the Global Knowledge Center on Crop Biotechnology, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications SEAsiaCenter (ISAAA), and AgBiotechNet 
April 20, 2001

In This Issue:

GM Corn Trial Sites in UK
UN Agencies Recommend Measures for Consumers on GM Foods
Greenpeace Sow GM Seeds of Confusion in Thailand
Canada to Sign Biosafety Protocol
Growth in GM Traits Predicted
Japan Brings in New Food Regulations
FDA Suggests Biotechnology Rules
 

GM Corn Trial Sites in UK

Farm scale trials for genetically-modified corn in the United Kingdom are scheduled to be set up by the end of April 2001. A total of 32 sites are targeted to be planted and will be monitored by the Scientific Steering Committee. Covering a three year program, the committee also recommended 60-75 sites for each of the other four herbicide-tolerant GM crops - spring oilseed rape, winter oilseed rape, beet and corn.

The UK government says that all of the seeds in the trials have been through years of rigorous safety tests and trials are not about the safety of GM technology. The trials aim to provide answers to questions about whether planting herbicide-tolerant GM crops and using weedkillers associated with them might affect the abundance and diversity of wildlife. Trial results will be analyzed by the committee and made available for public scrutiny.

 

Greenpeace Sow GM Seeds of Confusion in Thailand

Greenpeace announced that the Cabinet of the Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra decided to instruct the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives to halt all approvals for GM field trials. However, the Minister of Science and Technology has stated that the cabinet did not pass a resolution to this effect. He says that an agenda item on the subject was proposed and the Cabinet simply acknowledged the proposal. However, this seems to have been taken out of context by the Greenpeace press office.

Shinawatra later stated that Thailand does not oppose genetically modified organisms and he recognizes that they could improve crop productivity. He also said that more research was needed as currently the government could not rule out the possibility of GMOs harming humans.

Boontipa Simaskul, director-general of the Thai Commerce Ministry's Department of Business Economics, has indicated that a ban on GM imports would have international trade implications under World Trade Organization rules.

The Secretary General of the Bureau of Food and Drugs has said that Thailand's government will require labelling of genetically engineered food by the end of this year. Secretary General of the Food and Drugs Administration, Dr. Vichai Chokeviwat said on UBC Nation Television that the Thai government has a duty to let the public know about GE ingredients in food and confirmed that 'there will be labelling of GE foods by at least the end of the year'. He later repeated this on Kom-Chat-Luak programme on UBC 8.

 

Growth in GM Traits Predicted

The "current backlash" against genetically modified crops will subside as more consumer-directed products emerge in 2004-05. The market for testing for genetically modified materials in foodstuffs is predicted to blossom into a significant testing arena during the next five years as the volume and variety of genetically modified crops increases, according to a new market report. C

urrently this market is relatively small, extremely dynamic and exhibiting clear signs of future growth. The report from Strategic Consulting Inc., called The World Market for GM-Food Testing says roughly 43 million hectares of GM-crops were planted worldwide in 2000 and predicts this will increase to 85 million hectares in 2005.

GM crops, particularly those planted in 2004 and 2005, increasingly will encompass what the report calls Generation 2 and Generation 3 output traits, which will be critical in mitigating consumer backlash against agricultural biotechnology.

While the report predicts sustained testing during the next few years, specifically for StarLink, there will be a shift in testing needs from primarily meeting regulatory and non-GM-contract requirements to ensuring that desirable traits are present in the product, says Tom Weschler, President of Strategic Consulting, based in Woodstock, VT.

Today's GM-products, such as StarLink maize, are termed Generation 1. They yield positive input traits which primarily benefit food producers. Generation 2 traits also benefit food producers in reducing processing, energy, storage or transportation costs. Generation 3 products yield output traits that directly benefit the consumer, such as edible vaccines, anti-cancer vegetables, cholesterol-reducing grains and crops fortified with micronutrients.

 

FDA Suggests Biotechnology Rules

The US Food and Drug Administration has proposed a rule to require food developers to notify the FDA at least 120 days in advance of their intent to market a food or animal feed developed through biotechnology. Food developers would also be required to provide information to demonstrate that the product is as safe as its conventional counterpart.

 

UN Agencies Recommend Measures for Consumers on GM Foods

The United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization have forwarded recommendations to help protect consumers from risks that some genetically modified organisms (GMOs) could pose for certain people who suffer from food allergies.

The two UN agencies brought together experts to review the latest scientific information on allergens and foods derived from biotechnology. The recommendations aim to prevent the use of foods that commonly provoke allergies in bio-engineered foods.

 

Canada to Sign Biosafety Protocol

Canada will sign an international agreement to regulate the movement across international borders of living organisms modified by modern biotechnology. The goal of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, negotiated under the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, is to protect biodiversity while permitting trade of living modified plants, animals and microorganisms.

Biodiversity is defined under the Convention on Biological Diversity as the "variability among living organisms from all sources." "Canada already has a domestic regulatory framework for biotechnology products," said Environment Minister the David Anderson. "Our signature to the Protocol demonstrates our continued commitment to international cooperation and builds on our domestic and international actions to protect the environment and human health," he said.

"We will take a leadership role in achieving a Protocol that is workable and protects the environment without causing unnecessary trade disruptions," said Agriculture and Agri-Food Minister Lyle Vanclief. Signing the Protocol is the first step in a two-step decision process for Canada. Canada will consider ratification of the Protocol based on progress achieved in international discussions and decisions on how it can most effectively be implemented by Canada. Signing the Protocol will ensure that Canada is a full participant in the ongoing international discussions.

Environment Minister David Anderson will sign the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety for Canada at a meeting of the Commission on Sustainable Development at the United Nations in New York on April 19. Eighty-six countries have signed the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to date, and two have ratified it. The Protocol will come into force 90 days after 50 countries ratify it, likely within two or three years.

 

Japan Brings in New Food Regulations

Japan has brought in new legislation which requires labelling of genetically modified (GM) and organic food and includes tough measures to deal with unapproved GM products entering the country. The labelling rules also require ingredients that may cause an allergic reaction to be listed on food products.

The GM food labelling rules are as follows:

  • food containing less than 5% of approved GM crops are labelled as 'non GM'. o food containing non-GM crops or ingredients may be labelled as 'GM free'.
  • food products where a GM ingredient is one of the top 3 ingredients or where a GM ingredient accounts for more than 5% of the product weight must be labeled as GM.
  • food companies that do not segregate GM ingredients will have to label their products saying so.
  • animal feed and food in which genetically altered DNA cannot currently be detected are exempt from these regulations.
  • some specific food items are exempt from the labeling regulations: soy sauce, vegetable oil, corn flakes, glucose syrup, high fructose corn syrup alcoholic beverages containing maize starch, dextrin, and various potato products

Do not hesitate to tell other colleagues/contacts about this mail list. If they wish to join, they should send an e-mail message to knowledge.center@isaaa.org leaving the subject blank and entering the one-line text message as follows: SUBSCRIBE Crop Biotech Network

To stop receiving this newsletter, please send an e-mail message to knowledge.center@isaaa.org and write, "unsubscribe newsletter" in the subject box.

Please visit CropBiotech Net web pages (http://www.isaaa.org/kc) to view previous issues of this newsletter and see other available resources for download.

While we are still developing this site, feel free to e-mail (knowledge.center@isaaa.org) us for your views and comments on any crop biotechnology product and related issues.
Home :: Global Status :: CBT Update :: Info Resource :: Events :: BICs :: Directory :: About Us :: Editorial Policy

Copyright © 2006. CropBiotech Net.